Fifth Task Force on Planning and Preparedness

Location: Colombo, Sri LankaDate: 11 - 12 February 2020
481_3_lrgsize Image

The fifth meeting of the Task Force on Planning and Preparedness was held in Colombo, Sri Lanka, on 11-12 February 2020. The meeting was co-chaired by Indonesia and Australia.

In their presentations, country participants focused on irregular maritime migration challenges, and policy and operational responses.

Issues covered included trends, risks and assessments; policy objectives and national plans of action; relevant agencies and coordination mechanisms; prevention, disruption, and search and rescue; disembarkation and downstream reception and protection aspects; return and reintegration; and criminal investigations.

On cooperative frameworks, there was consideration of country experiences, case studies and lessons learnt, and priority areas for building capacity between regional countries.

IOM, UNHCR and UNODC noted good practices in managing irregular maritime movement – including reception, screening and referral mechanisms; differentiated procedures with regarding to asylum, trafficking victims and child protection; direct humanitarian assistance; post-arrival assistance; return of non-refugees; and protection and durable solutions.

The RSO canvassed legal elements, including on a comprehensive approach, issues and obligations with interception, search and rescue, and disembarkation. This was reinforced by UNHCR, IOM and UNODC, which noted sovereignty and security interests, international refugee and human rights law, and obligations to combat smuggling and trafficking.

Global context was provided by Turkey, France and Canada. Turkey outlined its significant maritime border security challenges, policy framework and operations, and cooperation with partners. France focused on its interests in the Indian Ocean region. Canada spoke about its domestic policy context and response.


On addressing irregular maritime migration, participants:

  • Emphasised the primacy of saving lives at sea and not endangering the life and safety of persons in responding to irregular maritime migration.
  • Supported the principle of non-refoulement (i.e. not forcing refugees and asylum seekers to return to a country in which they could be subject to persecution).
  • Accepted other relevant legal elements, including on a comprehensive approach, and obligations on interception, search and rescue, and disembarkation. There was consideration of sovereignty and security interests, refugee and human rights law, returns of non-refugees, and protection and durable solutions.
  • Canvassed good practices in managing irregular maritime arrivals. This focused on screening and referral mechanisms and differentiated procedures (i.e. asylum, victims of trafficking, child protection), as well as humanitarian assistance, post-arrival assistance, return of non-refugees,
    and protection and durable solutions.
  • Acknowledged constructive elements in cooperative frameworks and operations.
    − Having political will to address people smuggling and trafficking in persons, and zero tolerance toward those crimes, provided a solid foundation.
    − National action plans should be comprehensive and implemented through well trained and resourced policy and operational agencies.
    − There needed to be effective cooperation, between agencies at a national level, as well as bilaterally and regionally.
    − Policy, operations and cooperation needed to be reviewed on a regular basis to respond to evolving challenges, and adjusted as required.
  • Welcomed positive developments in policy, operational responses and cooperation by members to better respond to irregular maritime migration challenges.
  • Noted that political commitment could be increased in relation to disembarkation and post-disembarkation elements of response, and that this could translate to improved policy, operational and cooperation outcomes.
  • Recognised that information-sharing between members remained limited, and supported efforts to improve information-sharing bilaterally and regionally.
  • Called for the voluntary, safe and durable return and reintegration of displaced persons in the affected region, and for expediting arrangements to facilitate this.